Chris Uggen's Blog: media and crime trends, 1973-2005

Saturday, December 31, 2005

media and crime trends, 1973-2005

this time of year often brings media requests regarding trends in crime and punishment. answering such calls is important public criminology, but responding can be tricky. reporters often focus on year-to-year changes in rare events such as homicide, but the percent change in such cases can be very misleading. i see my role as providing some context for the local numbers, putting them in historical, national, and international perspective. reporters typically speak with both law enforcement officials and academics, so i try to offer some perspective. i usually focus on 5-, 10-, and 20-year trends and consider the magnitude as well as the direction of change.

by most measures, crime in minneapolis and st. paul rose from 2004 to 2005. this is cause for concern, in part because serious personal crimes such as aggravated assaults and robberies have increased sharply. that said, the base rate of crime in the twin cities is quite low relative to similar-sized cities and relative to local crime rates in the near and distant past. moreover, some of the bad news is a product of legal changes rather than behavioral changes. for example, a new state "strangulation" statute means that many domestic assault cases once considered misdemeanors are now counted among the aggravated assaults in the violent crime index (i learned this speaking with pete crum of the st. paul police department last week). despite the uptick, my take-home message for reporters who want my opinion this year is that national crime rates are at the lowest levels we've seen in forty years and that these are good times rather than bad ones.

here is my evidence for this assertion. rates of serious violent crime -- murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault -- continue a long decline, at least through midyear 2005. the chart above shows the national picture for violence as measured by both victimization (red dashed lines - - -) and crimes reported to police (solid lines). i plotted these on separate y-axes so you can see the relative change in each measure. note that violent victimization has been dropping like a stone since the mid-nineties, as have police reports of these four serious offenses.

the next figure shows that property crimes of burglary, larceny/theft, and motor vehicle theft also show a decline, although here the rates have flattened since 2002. nevertheless, for both violent and property crimes, victimization levels are at or near record lows, at rates roughly half those of a decade earlier.

of course, none of this makes crime victims or their families feel any better about it, nor does it mean that we no longer need to lock our doors or that we can scale back investments in law enforcement (punishment is another matter). it just means that rates of serious crime are lower today than they were 5 years ago, 10 years ago, 20 years ago, and 30 years ago. good news, right?


At 6:34 AM, Blogger Goesh said...

Despite the good numbers, I wonder if the Public's perception remains constant? I would speculate that the Public, however that could truly be measured, always 'sees' a rise in crime. The headlines glare of murder and mayhem and politicians manipulate the old law and order gambit to garnish votes. In the work-a-day world of John Q. Public, folks have little recourse or need to see the data as it really is. If a bad neighborhood remains bad, national and regional trends are meaningless to said residents of a bad neighborhood. I think the impetus for Social Scientists/Sociologists to go the extra mile with their distinctive knowledge, that is to do something with it and to become an activist with it, while alluring also gives cause for some apprehension. Are your numbers welcome by the forces that need murder and mayhem to sustain budgets and staff and hopefully increase funding? I would not mention you if I were approaching the city fathers to ask for more money to fight crime in the twin cities.

At 2:33 PM, Anonymous chris said...

goesh, there is some evidence that perceptions are starting to change. i posted here about declining fear of crime, support for the death penalty, and punitive attitudes. while the public is still very punitive, it seem as though there's a limit to how much we are willing to spend on crime when crime rates are declining.

At 6:44 PM, Blogger Tom Volscho said...

The million dollar question is still, Why would incarceration and other punitive approaches be increasing while crime rates are decreasing?

The whole notion of "fighting crime" is a PURELY POLITICAL WEAPON and it if policies under its auspices actually reduced crime such policies would be immediately abandoned, wouldn't they?

At 10:09 PM, Blogger vfdvgf said...

Welcome to lineage 2 adena Our WoW Gold, wow power leveling Online Maple Story mesos Store wow gold for World Guild Wars Gold Of Warcraft power leveling, Cheap 2moon dil WoW Gold, FFXI Gil World Of lotro gold Warcraft Gold, final fantasy gil warcraft goldlord of the rings gold

At 4:15 PM, Blogger star said...

Crime reduction has been a major success story in our community, throughout Chicago, and in urban cities across the country. Violent crime in the Hyde Park-South Kenwood community (47th Street to 61st Street/Cottage Grove Avenue to Lake Michigan) decreased 38 percent from 2000 to 2009 and was down 40 percent over the past five year period, 2005 to 2009.

Cialis online

At 3:46 PM, Blogger pierce79 said...

well now the crime trends are to rob with deadly weapons and to be very violent

generic Viaga Online

At 11:04 AM, Blogger zercath said...

I don’t know If I said it already but …I’m so glad I found this site buy viagra…Keep up the good work I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say great blog.


Post a Comment

<< Home