myers-briggs: i thought ENFP was an all-sports cable network
i recently took a myers-briggs personality test as part of a minnversity leadership program. completing the assessment, i wondered about test-retest reliability, response biases, and whether carl jung was looking over my shoulder.i get nervous about any psychological test (well, professor uggen, we don't usually recommend immediate hospitalization, but in your case...), but i tried to answer the questions honestly. my results classified me as enfp, which indicates: extraversion (rather than introversion); intuition (rather than sensing); feeling (rather than thinking) [ouch.]; and, perceiving (rather than judging).
i think of myself as data-driven and logical, so this classification was surprising. the ENFP descriptions seem pleasant enough and reasonable, but so do my horoscopes on most days. it was useful, however, to read materials that applied the personality characteristics to communication style, decision making, and dealing with change and conflict. for example, we ENFPs should be aware that people may think you have no real opinions or that you're hiding your real views with regard to communication. we're also urged to recognize that there are real costs involved in pursuing novelty and to monitor the timing of when you give up on consensus and push to action.
points taken. while i don't necessarily buy the whole jungian/myers-briggs scheme, the test was useful for self-examination. plus, i learned that mark twain, alicia silverstone, will rogers, andy kaufman, jack black, and tina fey are also ENFPs. maybe i should consider a career as a cantankerous curmudgeon or sketch comedian. fictional ENFPs include ariel from the little mermaid and steve urkel (not the actor who played urkel, mind you, but urkel).
if you'd like to take the test yourself, there are a few freebies of unknown quality out there. i'm going to keep taking the test until i can generate a higher score on thinking.
Labels: navel-gazing


15 Comments:
Dude, I totally LOVE the Myers-Briggs. It has proven quite useful in several work settings. Why you gotta hate on the "F"? I share my INFJ status with the likes of Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King, Jr., Nelson Mandela, and Tom Selleck.
I worked on some research on the MBTI way way back, and my opinion is that it has some reliability and validity, but can get a bit horoscopy around the edges. I happen to be an ENFJ, but I actually aspire to be ENFP because they are my favorite kind of people--fun, creative, very easy to be with. They're almost always running late, but I've learned to live with it (ENFJ's are usually pretty timely). I used to do some workplace workshops with it too, and I find that it is usually helpful in getting people to recognize differences in work styles and so forth and reducing the negative attributions they make about people who are different from them.
Also, for ENFP, the N function is a lot more dominant than the F (this is typical for academics), so the F is probably less differentiated from the T than your N is from your S. Also, I hate to say this, because it sounds like some kind of ominous transition, but people your (our) age tend to do some type swaping--they kind of start exploring the other sides of themselves and this can temprarily weaken the perferences in testing. So, your F might not be as big of a deal as it first appears.
This overdone analysis, without even meeting you, is probably the exact reason you are unconfortable with psych testing!
Still not understanding why the "F" needs to be a big deal at all...Last I checked I was (fairly) smart and not (all that) irrational.
sarah, i'm not hatin' on the f, i'm just hoping for some t. so, you get nelson mandela and mother teresa and i get tina fey and robin williams, eh?
thanks dan, i'm running late, but...
feeling better about my classification already. i was curious about the gender distribution, but the life course story is really fascinating. maybe i was a hardcore t and j during my early years as a dad and assistant prof, but changed as my world got more complicated.
The F on the Myers Briggs corresponds to Agreeableness in the more respected Five Factor Model inventories. So, the price of Thinking in MBTI is being Disagreeable in FFM.
I am a fan of the MBTI, but I wish that Jung didn't use "thinking" and "feeling" as the words to classify the two different judging function, because the former connotes intelligence and thoughtfulness (and the latter has connotations as well, especially gendered ones). As Jeremy points out, the two definitions have entirely different meanings, which leads to understandable misunderstandings like Sarah's.
Incidentally, I'm an INTP.
oh, and incidentally, i've noticed that _nf_ types tend to eschew capitalization as a stylistic (?) choice, just as chris does and i'm imitating right here.
The reasons they do so kind of mystify me.
Unless things have changed, E-I, S-N, J-P are all 50-50 across sex. Men are 75% T's, however, and Women are 75% Fs. Lots of debate in the literature about why it comes out like that.
Interestingly, a guy I knew was finding that T-F is MORE correlated with Carol Gilligan's "Care" versus "Justice" voices, than with gender. Don't know if he ever published that or not.
I am also an INFJ (though pretty weak on the N and the F) and quite strong on the I and the J (ouch!). I'm pretty laid back but "distinctively introverted?" Hmmmm... A little worried about the moderately judging too... I thought I was more fun than this!
Given that I am on the job market, I'm having to spend entirely too much time navel-gazing and worrying about my presentation of self so I think I'll will skip the introspective quizzes from now on...
One more thing... Too bad about Robin Williams (though I like Tina Fey).
On the other hand, the INFJ's get Nelson Mandela but we also have to suffer the association with Mel Gibson.
Sara, I guess we have more in common than just our names (however differentially spelled)! The Mel Gibson association is unfortunate...
Chris, I quarrel with your lament that being an "F" might imply that you are less "data-driven and logical." I would argue that "Fs" are quite data-driven and logical too, we just might be a bit more open to less-restricted definitions of data and more attentive to outliers and individual variation.
Can certainty see the "F" in Chris, but not the "P", at least from following his blog. Most people who consistently test ENFP tend to be a lot less organized and polished. I typically refer to an ENFP as a "Mentor". How well does that fit?
Testing "F" usually implies an emotionally based logic. An "F" would typically say 'I feel that..' while a "T" tends to say 'I think that...' Its a very basic difference in first-order processing.
The MBTI is fairly different than theories of maturation. Kohlberg, Gilligan, or Perry models measure development. For a sociologist, maybe the analogy that the MBTI is more of a 'cross-section' than a 'longitudinal model' helps.
As someone else pointed out above, I think the MBTI is very useful for helping to appreciate differences in people. That's at least my experience from seeing it taught in engineering programs, businesses, and civil service.
I do recall Gary Becker once saying that sociology is the study of the 'irrational'. Probably, abstract irrational, as social work is a bunch of irrational people who apply irrational thought without any organization.
dang, other nf-types really eschew capitalization? that is sooooo cool...
You may want to try www.enfpforum.com
It is a social network for ENFPs.
Thanks Saul -- much appreciated!
Post a Comment
<< Home