reflecting the world we meant to exclude

"are we scientists or poets?" my teacher's teacher asked of his students. i figured it for a false dichotomy, but chose science nonetheless.

still, something about this gregory orr poem strikes a familiar nerve. we too rely on the cool symmetries of shapes -- or concepts, from anomie to verstehen -- to reflect a world of chaos and grief.

Some Part of the Lyric

Some part of the lyric wants to exclude
the world with all its chaos and grief
and so conceives shapes (a tear, a globe of dew)

whose cool symmetries create a mood
of security. Which is something all need
and so, the lyric's urge to exclude

what hurts us isn't simply a crude
defense, but an embracing of a few
essential shapes: a tear, a globe of dew.

But to what end? Are there clues
in these forms to deeper mysteries
that no good poem should exclude?

What can a stripped art reveal? Is a nude
more naked than the eye can see?
Can a tear freed of salt be a globe of dew?

And most of all—is it something we can use?
Yes, but only as long as its beauty,
like that of a tear or a globe of dew,
reflects the world it meant to exclude.